Deaeration
Why Deaeration
Corrosion of iron
or steel in boilers or boilers feed water piping is caused by three fundamental
factors:
1. Feed water temperature
2. Feed water ph value
3. Feed water oxygen content
Temperature and
ph value influence the aggressiveness of corrosion. The higher the temperature,
and the lower the pH value the increased aggressiveness of the feed water. The
dissolved oxygen content of the feed water is a large factor in determining the
amount of corrosion that will take place. The presence of oxygen, and other
non-condensable gases, in the feed water is a major cause of corrosion in the
feed water piping, boiler, and condensate handling equipment.
In de-aeration, dissolved gases, such as oxygen and carbon dioxide, are expelled by preheating the feed water before it enters the boiler.
All natural waters contain dissolved gases in solution. Certain gases, such as carbon dioxide and oxygen, greatly increase corrosion. When heated in boiler systems, carbon dioxide (CO2) and oxygen (O2) are released as gases and combine with water (H2O) to form carbonic acid, (H2CO3).
Removal of oxygen, carbon dioxide and other non-condensable gases from boiler feed- water is vital to boiler equipment longevity as well as safety of operation. Carbonic acid corrodes metal reducing the life of equipment and piping. It also dissolves iron (Fe) which when returned to the boiler precipitates and causes scaling on the boiler and tubes. This scale not only contributes to reducing the life of the equipment but also increases the amount of energy needed to achieve heat transfer.
De-aeration can
be done by mechanical de-aeration, by chemical de-aeration or by both together.
Mechanical de-aeration
Mechanical de-aeration for the removal of these dissolved gases is typically utilized prior to the addition of chemical oxygen scavengers. Mechanical de-aeration is based on Charles’ and Henry’s laws of physics. Simplified, these laws state that removal of oxygen and carbon dioxide can be accomplished by heating the boiler feed water, which reduces the concentration of oxy- gen and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere surrounding the feed water. Mechanical de-aeration can be the most economical. They operate at the boiling point of water at the pressure in the de- aerator. They can be of vacuum or pressure type.
The vacuum type of de-aerator operates below atmospheric pressure, at about 82 °C, can reduce the oxygen content in water to less than 0.02 mg/liter. Vacuum pumps or steam ejectors are required to maintain the vacuum.
The pressure-type de-aerators operates by allowing steam into the feed water through a pressure control valve to maintain the desired operating pressure, and hence temperature at a minimum of 105 °C. The steam raises the water temperature causing the release of O2 and CO2 gases that are then vented from the system. This type can reduce the oxygen content to 0.005 mg/liter.
Where excess low-pressure steam is available, the operating pressure can be selected to make use of this steam and hence improve fuel economy. In boiler systems, steam is preferred for de-aeration because:
–
Steam is essentially free from O2 and CO2,
–
Steam is readily available
–
Steam adds the
heat required to complete the reaction.
While the most efficient mechanical deaerators reduce
oxygen to very
low levels (0.005 mg/liter), even trace amounts of
oxygen may cause corrosion damage to a system.
Consequently, good operating practice requires removal of that trace
oxygen with a chemical oxygen
scavenger such as sodium sulfite or hydrazine.
Sodium sulphite reacts with oxygen to
form sodium sulphate, which increases the TDS in the boiler water and
hence increases the blow down
requirements and make-up water quality. Hydrazine reacts with oxygen to form nitrogen and water. It is invariably used
in high pressures boilers when low boiler water solids are necessary, as it does not increase
the TDS of the boiler water.
Deaerator Principles
Deaeration is the
mechanical removal of dissolved gases from the boiler feed water. There are
three principles that must be met in the design of any deaerator.
1. The incoming feed water must be heated to
the full saturation temperature, corresponding to the steam pressure maintained
inside the deaerator. This will lower the solubility of the dissolved gases to
zero.
2. The heated feed water must be mechanically
agitated. This is accomplished in a tray deaerator by first spraying the water
in a thin film into a steam atmosphere. Creating a thin film reduces the
distance the gas bubble has to travel to be released from the water. Next, the
water is cascaded over a bank of slotted trays, further reducing the surface
tension of the water. This allows for the removal of any gases not liberated by
the initial spraying.
3. Adequate steam supply must be passed
through the water, in both the spray section and the tray section to sweep out
the gases from the water.
Deaerator Classification:
1. According to working pressure -
i) Vacuum deaerator - 0.116 MN/m2 - 1.18 Kg/cm2
ii) Atmospheric deaerator - 0.12 to 0.17 MN/m2 - 1.22 to 1.73 kg/cm2.
iii) High pressure deaerator - 0.17 to 0.7 MN/m2 - 1.73 to 7.13 Kg/cm2.
2. According to mode of steam water distribution -
i) Atomising deaerator
ii) Tray type or jet tray deaerator ( parallel flow or counter flow tray deaerator)
iii) Film type deaerator
Type of Atmospheric deaerator -
I) Direct contact (mixing) deaerator
II) Overheated water deaerator
Deaerator Designs
Over the years,
various types of deaerators have been developed. They are the counter-flow tray
type, the atomizer type, the packed tower type, and the parallel down flow
type, to name a few.
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Conclusion |
Parallel down
flow deaerators |
||
1. Time proven
design 2. Thousands of
installations worldwide 3. Design
suitable for small to medium size
plants 4. Can meet
outlet guarantees at varying plant conditions. 5. High tray
loading, resulting in higher outlet capacity for any given diameter. 6. Large tray
spilling edge, resulting in high deaerating efficiency 7. Low vent
rate, resulting in increased operating efficiency. |
1. More
complicated design, resulting in slightly higher cost. |
|
Counterflow
deaerators |
||
1. The counter
flow deaerator is cheaper to manufacture |
1. Inability to
deliver 0.007 ppb outlet quality in applications with a low inlet water
temperature, or when 100% make-up is required. 2. Low tray
loading. This reduces the flow rating for a given diameter deaerator vs. a
parallel down flow unit. 3. High vent
rate. This reduces operating efficiency |
|
Atomizer
deaerators |
||
1. Low cost 2. Low overall
height |
1. Inability to
deliver 7 ppb outlet quality when plant conditions vary from design
specifications. Requires constant plant conditions. 2. Failure rate
of the atomizer valve, and maintenance required to keep it operating
properly. |
|
Packed tower |
||
1. Low cost 2. Low
maintenance 3. Ability to
handle varying plant conditions |
1. Height
requirement 2. Typically
considered for small size plants. |
|
Description of
Deaerator Operation
• Parallel downflow
In this design,
the inlet water is sprayed into a steam atmosphere through variable orifice,
spring loaded spray nozzle(s). This action heats the water to within 2 to 3
degrees of the steam temperature, while liberating 90% to 95% of the dissolved
gases.
This pre-heated,
partially departed water then flows down through a water seal(s) for
distribution over the tray bank. The water seal(s) serve two functions. First
they prevent gases liberated in the initiate heating, from entering the tray
bank. Second they direct the steam to flow down through the trays, before
entering the upper heating section.
The main function
of the tray bank is to remove the remaining amounts of dissolved gases, not
liberated in the initial heating. Since very little, or no heating takes place
in the trays, the entire volume of steam is used to scrub out the remaining
gases. The trays are slotted, and provide a great amount of spilling edge. This
allows for a great amount of water surface area to be exposed to the steam.
Water flows downward through the trays. Steam flows downward through the trays.
Thus the name parallel downflow.
The steam, after
exiting the tray bank, then flows upward into the top of the deaerator where it
is used to heat the incoming water being discharged by the spray nozzles. The
steam is condensed by the colder inlet water, and a small amount is vented to
atmosphere, along with the dissolved gases.
The deaerated
water flows from the deaerator down into the storage tank. The stored water is
covered by a steam blanket, to maintain heat, pressure, and prevent
recontamination of the deaerated water.
In this
proprietary design, the inlet water is sprayed into a steam atmosphere through
a variable orifice, spring loaded spray nozzle. This action heats the water to
within 2 to 3 degrees of the steam temperature, while liberating 90% to 95% of
the dissolved gases.
The heated water
flows down onto a distribution plate. This plate evenly distributes the water
over the entire cross-sectional area of the tower packing.
As the water
flows down through the distribution plate it enters a steam chest area, where
the water is further heated by up flowing steam, and more of the dissolved
gases are liberated.
Any remaining
dissolved gases are removed when the water flows down from the steam chest and
then down through the packing tower. The packing tower function is to expose a
greater surface area of the water; while up flowing steam completes the
deaeration process
Comments
Post a Comment